AIWorkerz
Profession pack

AI Native Scrum Master

Convert the existing Scrum Master role into an AI-native operating model through 30 days of simulated workplace practice, evidence and assessment.

Product & Technology30 daysProduction-ready
Start guided programmeView 30-day plan
Role walkthroughApp screens and 30-day flow
Not a course preview.

The video shows how this role is presented in the AIWorkerz app: simulated company context, guided AI-native work, day-by-day evidence and accreditation progression.

Simulated workplace

How AIWorkerz makes a Scrum Master AI Native

Learners do the role inside an imaginary company rather than consuming generic training. Each day gives them role-specific pressure, context, stakeholder tension and an accountable work product to produce with AI as an operating partner.

SenseFrameDelegateVerifyDecideImprove
Duration

30 days

Orientation, guided work, applied practice, integration and capstone.

Evidence

30 outputs

Daily work products show the learner can perform the role in an AI-native way.

Credential

Accredited AI Native Scrum Master

Public verification follows assessor acceptance and accreditation checks.

Capability shift

What changes in the role

Professional judgementAI delegationEvidence verificationStakeholder communicationWorkflow redesignResponsible AI use

The learner practises when to use AI, how to verify its work, what judgement cannot be delegated and how to leave a clear evidence trail.

Access

$995 30-day course

After the 30-day active window, learners retain read-only course history and can extend active use for $100/month.

30-day curriculum

What this pack teaches day by day

The programme is structured as a workplace simulation: each day has a role-specific objective, guided activities and a required evidence output.

ORIENTATIONGUIDED WORKAPPLIED PRACTICEINTEGRATIONCAPSTONE

By Day 30, the learner has produced a complete portfolio showing how they sense context, frame work, delegate to AI, verify claims, make accountable decisions and improve the operating system of the role.

1
ORIENTATION

Day 1: Understand AI-native Scrum Master performance

Learn which Scrum Master responsibilities remain human when AI performs research, drafting, analysis and synthesis.

Why it matters

The learner must separate AI assistance from professional accountability before using AI in real work.

Evidence output

Scrum Master accountability map

Activities

  1. Review the Scrum Master mandate and simulated organisationReview the Scrum Master mandate and simulated organisation for understand ai-native scrum master performance.
  2. Classify human judgement versus AI-assistable workClassify human judgement versus AI-assistable work for understand ai-native scrum master performance.
  3. Submit the Scrum Master accountability mapSubmit the Scrum Master accountability map for understand ai-native scrum master performance.
2
ORIENTATION

Day 2: Map the Scrum Master operating system

Understand the stakeholders, workflows, systems, data, decisions and constraints that shape Scrum Master performance.

Why it matters

AI-native work is only useful when it is grounded in the real operating context of the profession.

Evidence output

Scrum Master stakeholder and workflow map

Activities

  1. Review the operating profileReview the operating profile for map the scrum master operating system.
  2. Map stakeholders and decision rightsMap stakeholders and decision rights for map the scrum master operating system.
  3. Identify tensions requiring professional judgementIdentify tensions requiring professional judgement for map the scrum master operating system.
3
ORIENTATION

Day 3: Complete the Scrum Master baseline assessment

Respond to an ambiguous impediment removal scenario with limited guidance and an explicit AI-use record.

Why it matters

The baseline establishes starting capability across framing, delegation, verification, judgement and communication.

Evidence output

Scrum Master baseline decision brief

Activities

  1. Review the baseline scenarioReview the baseline scenario for complete the scrum master baseline assessment.
  2. Produce an AI-supported responseProduce an AI-supported response for complete the scrum master baseline assessment.
  3. Submit the diagnostic evidenceSubmit the diagnostic evidence for complete the scrum master baseline assessment.
4
GUIDED WORK

Day 4: Frame a team learning decision

Convert an unclear request into a precise decision question, constraints, success criteria and evidence needs.

Why it matters

Poorly framed professional work produces confident AI output that cannot support a real decision.

Evidence output

team learning decision frame

Activities

  1. Review the stakeholder requestReview the stakeholder request for frame a team learning decision.
  2. Define decision scope and constraintsDefine decision scope and constraints for frame a team learning decision.
  3. Submit the decision frameSubmit the decision frame for frame a team learning decision.
5
GUIDED WORK

Day 5: Build a professional AI work instruction

Create a complete instruction for AI that specifies outcome, context, constraints, evidence standard and review criteria.

Why it matters

AI delegation must make authority, assumptions and verification responsibilities explicit.

Evidence output

Scrum Master AI work instruction

Activities

  1. Select relevant contextSelect relevant context for build a professional ai work instruction.
  2. Construct the AI work instructionConstruct the AI work instruction for build a professional ai work instruction.
  3. Review it against Scrum Master delegation criteriaReview it against Scrum Master delegation criteria for build a professional ai work instruction.
6
GUIDED WORK

Day 6: Separate facts, assumptions and inference in retrospective evidence

Review an AI-generated analysis and classify each material claim as fact, assumption, inference or unsupported assertion.

Why it matters

The profession becomes AI-native when fluent output is tested against evidence before action.

Evidence output

retrospective evidence claim verification register

Activities

  1. Read the AI analysisRead the AI analysis for separate facts, assumptions and inference in retrospective evidence.
  2. Classify material claimsClassify material claims for separate facts, assumptions and inference in retrospective evidence.
  3. Record verification requirementsRecord verification requirements for separate facts, assumptions and inference in retrospective evidence.
7
GUIDED WORK

Day 7: Challenge the evidence behind stakeholder cadence

Interrogate a persuasive recommendation by testing inputs, missing data, incentives, constraints and downside cases.

Why it matters

Professional judgement requires challenge before convergence, especially when AI compresses analysis time.

Evidence output

stakeholder cadence evidence challenge brief

Activities

  1. Review the recommendationReview the recommendation for challenge the evidence behind stakeholder cadence.
  2. Ask decision-reversing questionsAsk decision-reversing questions for challenge the evidence behind stakeholder cadence.
  3. Submit a revised evidence viewSubmit a revised evidence view for challenge the evidence behind stakeholder cadence.
8
GUIDED WORK

Day 8: Resolve conflicting advice on work-in-progress control

Reconcile competing stakeholder views without averaging away the real trade-off.

Why it matters

AI-native professionals use AI to clarify trade-offs while retaining accountable judgement.

Evidence output

work-in-progress control alignment record

Activities

  1. Review opposing positionsReview opposing positions for resolve conflicting advice on work-in-progress control.
  2. Define decision criteriaDefine decision criteria for resolve conflicting advice on work-in-progress control.
  3. Record the professional resolutionRecord the professional resolution for resolve conflicting advice on work-in-progress control.
9
GUIDED WORK

Day 9: Communicate a coaching recommendation

Turn complex analysis into concise communication that preserves uncertainty, cites evidence and asks for the right action.

Why it matters

Professional influence depends on clear communication, not simply better analysis.

Evidence output

coaching recommendation note

Activities

  1. Review the evidence trailReview the evidence trail for communicate a coaching recommendation.
  2. Draft the stakeholder communicationDraft the stakeholder communication for communicate a coaching recommendation.
  3. Submit the final recommendationSubmit the final recommendation for communicate a coaching recommendation.
10
GUIDED WORK

Day 10: Verify before acting on AI-enabled team practices

Detect polished but unsupported AI output and produce a corrected recommendation with explicit confidence levels.

Why it matters

AI-native practice requires verification routines that prevent fluency bias from becoming operational risk.

Evidence output

Verified AI-enabled team practices recommendation

Activities

  1. Run the AI analysisRun the AI analysis for verify before acting on ai-enabled team practices.
  2. Mark unsupported conclusionsMark unsupported conclusions for verify before acting on ai-enabled team practices.
  3. Submit the corrected recommendationSubmit the corrected recommendation for verify before acting on ai-enabled team practices.
11
APPLIED PRACTICE

Day 11: Prioritise competing Scrum Master demands

Choose between competing work, risk and value priorities while explaining what AI can and cannot decide.

Why it matters

The role requires transparent trade-offs when time, attention and evidence are constrained.

Evidence output

Scrum Master priority decision memorandum

Activities

  1. Review competing casesReview competing cases for prioritise competing scrum master demands.
  2. Use AI to compare scenariosUse AI to compare scenarios for prioritise competing scrum master demands.
  3. Submit the priority decisionSubmit the priority decision for prioritise competing scrum master demands.
12
APPLIED PRACTICE

Day 12: Respond to a facilitation performance shock

Lead the first response to a material performance issue using AI-supported diagnosis and human escalation judgement.

Why it matters

The learner must stabilise work without reacting to incomplete or misleading information.

Evidence output

facilitation response plan

Activities

  1. Review the incident briefingReview the incident briefing for respond to a facilitation performance shock.
  2. Set response priorities and decision gatesSet response priorities and decision gates for respond to a facilitation performance shock.
  3. Issue the professional directionIssue the professional direction for respond to a facilitation performance shock.
13
APPLIED PRACTICE

Day 13: Challenge an AI recommendation on impediment removal

Decide whether to accept, revise or reject an AI-supported recommendation under time pressure.

Why it matters

The profession needs accountable review of AI output before commitments are made.

Evidence output

impediment removal decision brief

Activities

  1. Review the recommendation and evidence packReview the recommendation and evidence pack for challenge an ai recommendation on impediment removal.
  2. Challenge assumptions and riskChallenge assumptions and risk for challenge an ai recommendation on impediment removal.
  3. Commit and explain the decisionCommit and explain the decision for challenge an ai recommendation on impediment removal.
14
APPLIED PRACTICE

Day 14: Lead through a team learning constraint

Diagnose a constraint affecting outcomes while balancing service, quality, cost, risk and stakeholder confidence.

Why it matters

AI-native professionals improve the system rather than treating symptoms in isolation.

Evidence output

team learning recovery directive

Activities

  1. Review performance evidenceReview performance evidence for lead through a team learning constraint.
  2. Test root-cause explanationsTest root-cause explanations for lead through a team learning constraint.
  3. Set the recovery mandateSet the recovery mandate for lead through a team learning constraint.
15
APPLIED PRACTICE

Day 15: Make a responsible automation decision

Evaluate an AI or automation proposal affecting work quality, trust, fairness and professional control.

Why it matters

AI productivity decisions create human, ethical and operational consequences that the role must own.

Evidence output

Responsible Scrum Master automation decision

Activities

  1. Review productivity and risk evidenceReview productivity and risk evidence for make a responsible automation decision.
  2. Define transition principles and safeguardsDefine transition principles and safeguards for make a responsible automation decision.
  3. Submit the automation decisionSubmit the automation decision for make a responsible automation decision.
16
APPLIED PRACTICE

Day 16: Handle a data, quality or compliance incident

Lead the professional response to an issue with incomplete facts and potential stakeholder harm.

Why it matters

AI-native work must include escalation thresholds, evidence discipline and clear accountability.

Evidence output

Scrum Master incident record

Activities

  1. Review the incident briefingReview the incident briefing for handle a data, quality or compliance incident.
  2. Question technical and compliance positionsQuestion technical and compliance positions for handle a data, quality or compliance incident.
  3. Approve the response planApprove the response plan for handle a data, quality or compliance incident.
17
APPLIED PRACTICE

Day 17: Protect trust during scrutiny of stakeholder cadence

Respond when an AI-supported decision or output is challenged by stakeholders.

Why it matters

Trust is preserved through evidence, disclosure, correction and accountable professional judgement.

Evidence output

stakeholder cadence trust response brief

Activities

  1. Review challenge claimsReview challenge claims for protect trust during scrutiny of stakeholder cadence.
  2. Test the organisation's evidenceTest the organisation's evidence for protect trust during scrutiny of stakeholder cadence.
  3. Issue the trust responseIssue the trust response for protect trust during scrutiny of stakeholder cadence.
18
APPLIED PRACTICE

Day 18: Transfer the method to real Scrum Master work

Apply the Sense-Frame-Delegate-Verify-Decide-Improve loop to a genuine non-confidential task from the learner's role.

Why it matters

Transfer proves the method improves professional performance beyond the simulation.

Evidence output

Real-work Scrum Master application note

Activities

  1. Define the real taskDefine the real task for transfer the method to real scrum master work.
  2. Use the structured AI workflowUse the structured AI workflow for transfer the method to real scrum master work.
  3. Submit an attested application noteSubmit an attested application note for transfer the method to real scrum master work.
19
INTEGRATION

Day 19: Redesign a recurring Scrum Master workflow

Map how recurring work should operate when AI supports research, analysis, drafting, checking and communication.

Why it matters

AI-native capability changes the operating workflow, not just individual productivity.

Evidence output

AI-native Scrum Master workflow

Activities

  1. Map the current workflowMap the current workflow for redesign a recurring scrum master workflow.
  2. Allocate human and AI ownershipAllocate human and AI ownership for redesign a recurring scrum master workflow.
  3. Submit the redesigned workflowSubmit the redesigned workflow for redesign a recurring scrum master workflow.
20
INTEGRATION

Day 20: Define the Scrum Master AI operating model

Set accountabilities, escalation points, evidence standards and collaboration patterns for AI-supported work.

Why it matters

Sustainable AI use requires explicit operating rules and professional ownership.

Evidence output

Scrum Master AI operating model

Activities

  1. Review current governance gapsReview current governance gaps for define the scrum master ai operating model.
  2. Design decision rights and escalationDesign decision rights and escalation for define the scrum master ai operating model.
  3. Publish the operating modelPublish the operating model for define the scrum master ai operating model.
21
INTEGRATION

Day 21: Establish verification controls for flow metrics

Define proportionate controls for low, medium and high-consequence AI-supported work.

Why it matters

Not every output needs the same assurance, but consequential work needs traceable verification.

Evidence output

flow metrics assurance framework

Activities

  1. Classify consequence levelsClassify consequence levels for establish verification controls for flow metrics.
  2. Design evidence and approval controlsDesign evidence and approval controls for establish verification controls for flow metrics.
  3. Submit the assurance frameworkSubmit the assurance framework for establish verification controls for flow metrics.
22
INTEGRATION

Day 22: Lead adoption without losing trust

Respond to resistance, inconsistent practice and unrealistic expectations around AI-enabled work.

Why it matters

Adoption is a leadership system involving purpose, capability, incentives and credible safeguards.

Evidence output

Scrum Master AI adoption plan

Activities

  1. Review adoption signalsReview adoption signals for lead adoption without losing trust.
  2. Diagnose resistance and trust risksDiagnose resistance and trust risks for lead adoption without losing trust.
  3. Set the interventionSet the intervention for lead adoption without losing trust.
23
INTEGRATION

Day 23: Set responsible AI governance for Scrum Master

Approve role-level principles, prohibited uses, escalation thresholds and review responsibilities.

Why it matters

Governance must enable value while making unacceptable use and accountability explicit.

Evidence output

Responsible Scrum Master AI mandate

Activities

  1. Review proposed governance policyReview proposed governance policy for set responsible ai governance for scrum master.
  2. Challenge gaps and vague ownershipChallenge gaps and vague ownership for set responsible ai governance for scrum master.
  3. Approve the mandateApprove the mandate for set responsible ai governance for scrum master.
24
INTEGRATION

Day 24: Measure value from AI in Scrum Master

Replace usage metrics with measures of value, cycle time, quality, risk reduction and capability transfer.

Why it matters

AI-native performance must be measured by improved professional outcomes, not prompt volume.

Evidence output

Scrum Master AI value scorecard

Activities

  1. Review current metricsReview current metrics for measure value from ai in scrum master.
  2. Define value measuresDefine value measures for measure value from ai in scrum master.
  3. Approve the scorecardApprove the scorecard for measure value from ai in scrum master.
25
INTEGRATION

Day 25: Coach a colleague in AI-native Scrum Master work

Improve a weaker AI-supported work product without taking over the colleague's accountability.

Why it matters

The learner must build capability in others while preserving clear professional ownership.

Evidence output

Scrum Master AI coaching record

Activities

  1. Review the colleague's workReview the colleague's work for coach a colleague in ai-native scrum master work.
  2. Conduct a coaching conversationConduct a coaching conversation for coach a colleague in ai-native scrum master work.
  3. Record capability actionsRecord capability actions for coach a colleague in ai-native scrum master work.
26
INTEGRATION

Day 26: Build the Scrum Master 90-day AI-native operating plan

Integrate workflow redesign, governance, capability, measurement and stakeholder communication into a practical plan.

Why it matters

The plan demonstrates movement from isolated tool use to sustained AI-native professional practice.

Evidence output

Scrum Master AI-native 90-day plan

Activities

  1. Review all integration evidenceReview all integration evidence for build the scrum master 90-day ai-native operating plan.
  2. Prioritise the first 90 daysPrioritise the first 90 days for build the scrum master 90-day ai-native operating plan.
  3. Submit the operating planSubmit the operating plan for build the scrum master 90-day ai-native operating plan.
27
CAPSTONE

Day 27: Prepare the independent capstone

Review accreditation criteria and receive a new Scrum Master scenario without guided answers.

Why it matters

The capstone tests independent transfer across the complete capability model.

Evidence output

Capstone preparation record

Activities

  1. Review the accreditation rubricReview the accreditation rubric for prepare the independent capstone.
  2. Inspect the capstone workplaceInspect the capstone workplace for prepare the independent capstone.
  3. Declare the evidence strategyDeclare the evidence strategy for prepare the independent capstone.
28
CAPSTONE

Day 28: Capstone: diagnose and frame

Diagnose a multi-dimensional work-in-progress control challenge and define the professional decisions required.

Why it matters

Independent framing determines whether AI work is relevant, safe and decision-ready.

Evidence output

Capstone Scrum Master decision architecture

Activities

  1. Review the capstone evidence roomReview the capstone evidence room for capstone: diagnose and frame.
  2. Frame the decisionsFrame the decisions for capstone: diagnose and frame.
  3. Submit the capstone decision architectureSubmit the capstone decision architecture for capstone: diagnose and frame.
29
CAPSTONE

Day 29: Capstone: decide and communicate

Use AI, verify critical claims, resolve stakeholder tension and issue a decision-ready work product.

Why it matters

This is the final demonstration of AI-native Scrum Master performance under pressure.

Evidence output

Capstone Scrum Master decision portfolio

Activities

  1. Run and challenge the analysisRun and challenge the analysis for capstone: decide and communicate.
  2. Commit to the decisionCommit to the decision for capstone: decide and communicate.
  3. Submit communication and action planSubmit communication and action plan for capstone: decide and communicate.
30
CAPSTONE

Day 30: Accreditation review

Review the complete evidence portfolio, capability profile and assessor decision.

Why it matters

Accreditation confirms demonstrated professional capability, not content completion or attendance.

Evidence output

AI Native Scrum Master accreditation record

Activities

  1. Review portfolio completenessReview portfolio completeness for accreditation review.
  2. Confirm learner attestationsConfirm learner attestations for accreditation review.
  3. Receive accreditation decisionReceive accreditation decision for accreditation review.